Sunday, February 24, 2008

Tempted to have one..


To have or not to have..

I have been surveying about dSLR camera's this past few days. And i'm confused either to get the Canon EOS400D or Nikon D40x. The difference between both of them is that, D40x is very user friendly a.K.a easy to use than the 400D. But the price are almost the same. And, 400D has alot of accessories unlike the D40x which only has limited lenses.

Trying to get a dSLR sometime around June or July this year if i can, and most of all *hopefuli* going to get it in the local market. Hence, some of my friends is going to Singapore in June, right after the school holiday starts and i know, some of the dSLR there are quite cheap. *sigh* But.. nahh.. im going to get it here in Brunei .. atleast there's a warranty for the dSLR

3 comments:

Mr Syaf said...

the 400D is a good camera but I would suggest you get a Nikon for your first so you won't have to change mid-way.

Support-wise, canon might be bigger here but Nikon has a large enough support group in Brunei.

I use Sony Alpha though but that's a matter of opinion.

btw, you're linked

Marriz said...

thanx syaf for the opinion

Mirez said...

Which Nikon would you be referring to?

Budget-wise wd be D40, D40X & D60

The Canon 400D wd be arnd the same price too =p

Wats the diff btwn them? =p